Mandating ethanol daisy de la hoya dating joshua lee
Read More For the last 13 years, the RFS has been a lose-lose policy for American energy independence and consumer choice.Ethanol mandates were supposed to make the United States more energy independent, help our environment and bring an economic boom for farmers. Read More The EPA just released its proposal for the 2019 Renewable Volume Obligations under the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).The measure also is supported by the National Wildlife Federation and the Sierra Club.AG, BIOFUELS RESPONSEBiofuels and agriculture interest groups were quick to discount the legislation.Kevin Skunes, president of the National Corn Growers Association and an Arthur, North Dakota, farmer, said the legislation makes a number of false assumptions about the environmental stewardship of farmers."This legislation seeks to kill our most successful American renewable energy program," he said in a statement to DTN."The bill ignores current science reflecting the significant environmental benefits of ethanol and would have catastrophic consequences for our nation's economy, our energy security, and family farmers.Read More By now, you know about the failures of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).Ethanol mandates were supposed to make the United States more energy independent, help our environment and bring an economic boom for farmers. Read More Twenty senators wrote to President Trump last week cautioning against an EPA plan to change Clean Air Act rules and pump more ethanol into the fuel market.
During the press call, the lawmakers said numerous studies point to the loss of sensitive grasslands and habitats as a result of crop expansion.It's dead on arrival with any lawmaker who cares about the climate, energy security, or the farm economy."Todd Neeley can be reached at [email protected] him on Twitter @toddneeley DTN(AG/CZ)© Copyright 2018 DTN/The Progressive Farmer. The Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) mandates the use of ethanol in domestic gasoline supplies."The first casualty of this legislation will be consumer choice at the fuel pump, when they will be forced to buy more expensive gasoline, and the second will be the environment as we increase reliance on fuel that produces more greenhouse gases and toxic emissions like benzene."Though Welch and Udall said the legislation is aimed at expanding the production of advanced biofuels, one industry official was not impressed."This might be the most ridiculous and politically tone-deaf energy bill ever proposed," said Brooke Coleman, executive director of the Advanced Biofuels Business Council."The real question is why two Democrats are leading a fruitless effort to increase the use of carbon-intensive fossil fuels like tar sands."Bob Dinneen, president and CEO of the Renewable Fuels Association, said the bill would "throw the program into reverse, erasing more than a decade of progress."A USDA analysis recently found corn-based ethanol reduces greenhouse gas emissions by 43% on average compared to conventional gasoline, and could reach 76% by 2022."The bill also blatantly ignores reality by seeking to cap ethanol blends to no more than 9.7% by volume," Dinneen said.