Carbon dating not reliable

(4.) Traditional 14C testing assumes equilibrium in the rate of formation and the rate of decay.In fact, 14C is forming FASTER than the observed decay rate.So when you hear of a date of 30,000 years for a carbon date we believe it to be early after creation and only about 7,000 years old.If something carbon dates at 7,000 years we believe 5,000 is probably closer to reality (just before the flood).Radiocarbon dating is a key tool archaeologists use to determine the age of plants and objects made with organic material.But new research shows that commonly accepted radiocarbon dating standards can miss the mark -- calling into question historical timelines.

After all, this what the archeologist guessed in their published books.This is only because it is well calibrated with objects of known age.Example: wood found in a grave of known age by historically reliable documents is the standard for that time for the C14 content.Manning, professor of archaeology at Cornell University and director of the Cornell Tree-Ring Laboratory, is the lead author of "Fluctuating Radiocarbon Offsets Observed in the Southern Levant and Implications for Archaeological Chronology Debates," published in the .Pre-modern radiocarbon chronologies rely on standardized Northern and Southern Hemisphere calibration curves to obtain calendar dates from organic material.

Leave a Reply